https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785906 Petitioner paid GST on contract works and produced verification from the tax authority; respondents cannot deny reimbursement solely because a final bill and no-claim certificate exist. The supplementary agreement submitted by the petitioner carried requisite signatures on his part but was not executed by the department, and this failure by respondents does not defeat the claim. Identical administrative acceptances of GST neutralisation in related projects were relied on. Outcome: petitioner entitled to GST reimbursement and department directed to accept the neutralisation claim and reimburse accordingly. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785906 Petitioner paid GST on contract works and produced verification from the tax authority; respondents cannot deny reimbursement solely because a final bill and no-claim certificate exist. The supplementary agreement submitted by the petitioner carried requisite signatures on his part but was not executed by the department, and this failure by respondents does not defeat the claim. Identical administrative acceptances of GST neutralisation in related projects were relied on. Outcome: petitioner entitled to GST reimbursement and department directed to accept the neutralisation claim and reimburse accordingly. Case-Laws GST Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785906