https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785908 Where a statutory appeal is available against a GST demand order, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked to bypass that remedy. The petitioner had participated in the audit and proceedings, and the challenge to the audit report, show cause notice and consequential demand order was held to be fit for consideration before the appellate authority under the GST statute. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy without adjudication on the merits. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785908 Where a statutory appeal is available against a GST demand order, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked to bypass that remedy. The petitioner had participated in the audit and proceedings, and the challenge to the audit report, show cause notice and consequential demand order was held to be fit for consideration before the appellate authority under the GST statute. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy without adjudication on the merits. Case-Laws GST Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785908