https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785915 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked where an effective statutory appeal is available, even if the petitioner alleges non-service of notice and denial of personal hearing. The appellate forum can examine both facts and law, including the mode of service, compliance with prescribed communication requirements, and the hearing grievance. On that basis, the writ petition was held not maintainable at this stage, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785915 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked where an effective statutory appeal is available, even if the petitioner alleges non-service of notice and denial of personal hearing. The appellate forum can examine both facts and law, including the mode of service, compliance with prescribed communication requirements, and the hearing grievance. On that basis, the writ petition was held not maintainable at this stage, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws GST Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785915