<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 113 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785918</link>
    <description>Fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit was raised as the central issue in relation to maintainability of a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227, including the scope of extraordinary writ jurisdiction, natural justice, and relegation to the statutory appellate remedy. The Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment in exercise of Article 136 jurisdiction and dismissed the special leave petitions, leaving the underlying order undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 113 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785918</link>
      <description>Fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit was raised as the central issue in relation to maintainability of a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227, including the scope of extraordinary writ jurisdiction, natural justice, and relegation to the statutory appellate remedy. The Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment in exercise of Article 136 jurisdiction and dismissed the special leave petitions, leaving the underlying order undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>