https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96533 Invoked extended limitation under the proviso to section 28(1) was rejected because revenue failed to prove deliberate suppression to evade duty; first check, examination and Textile Committee testing matched declared goods and an out-of-charge order was issued, showing departmental knowledge. The claim that end use was unknown at first check did not establish intent to evade. Consequently, demands founded solely on the extended period, including duty, interest, penalty and confiscation, were vacated and the appeal allowed. en-us Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:23 +0530 Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96533 Invoked extended limitation under the proviso to section 28(1) was rejected because revenue failed to prove deliberate suppression to evade duty; first check, examination and Textile Committee testing matched declared goods and an out-of-charge order was issued, showing departmental knowledge. The claim that end use was unknown at first check did not establish intent to evade. Consequently, demands founded solely on the extended period, including duty, interest, penalty and confiscation, were vacated and the appeal allowed. Highlights Customs Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:23 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96533