<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Invitation for Expression of Interest process: belated EoI without provisional list breached Regulation 36A; plan approval refused, CIRP reopened.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96507</link>
    <description>Regulation 36A requires issuance of a provisional list of prospective resolution applicants (PRAs), invitation for objections, and a final list before a belated EoI can be included; inclusion without publishing the provisional list and inviting objections violates the statutory process. The tribunal held that the resolution plan considered after such non-compliance could not be approved and upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s refusal of that plan. The tribunal found no recorded ineligibility of the applicant and no breach of the CIRP period, but set aside the liquidation direction and ordered re-commencement of CIRP with a fresh Form-G, publication of provisional and final PRA lists and fresh invitation for resolution plans within 90 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Invitation for Expression of Interest process: belated EoI without provisional list breached Regulation 36A; plan approval refused, CIRP reopened.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96507</link>
      <description>Regulation 36A requires issuance of a provisional list of prospective resolution applicants (PRAs), invitation for objections, and a final list before a belated EoI can be included; inclusion without publishing the provisional list and inviting objections violates the statutory process. The tribunal held that the resolution plan considered after such non-compliance could not be approved and upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s refusal of that plan. The tribunal found no recorded ineligibility of the applicant and no breach of the CIRP period, but set aside the liquidation direction and ordered re-commencement of CIRP with a fresh Form-G, publication of provisional and final PRA lists and fresh invitation for resolution plans within 90 days.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>