https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466287 Bail was granted to an appellant facing allegations under the Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act because the investigation was nearing completion, no attempt to tamper with prosecution witnesses was shown, and no antecedents were established. The Court treated these factual considerations as sufficient to justify release while protecting the proceedings through stringent conditions. It required regular and punctual appearance before the Trial Court, cooperation in the trial, and preserved liberty to seek cancellation of bail if the appellant caused delay in the proceedings. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:14:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466287 Bail was granted to an appellant facing allegations under the Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act because the investigation was nearing completion, no attempt to tamper with prosecution witnesses was shown, and no antecedents were established. The Court treated these factual considerations as sufficient to justify release while protecting the proceedings through stringent conditions. It required regular and punctual appearance before the Trial Court, cooperation in the trial, and preserved liberty to seek cancellation of bail if the appellant caused delay in the proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466287