<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1694 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466293</link>
    <description>Interference with a High Court order quashing preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 was found unwarranted where the detenue had already remained in custody for a few months, had been released, and a statutory complaint under the Customs Act, 1962 was pending adjudication. In those circumstances, the Court found no compelling basis to disturb the impugned judgment at that stage and declined interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 19:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1694 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466293</link>
      <description>Interference with a High Court order quashing preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 was found unwarranted where the detenue had already remained in custody for a few months, had been released, and a statutory complaint under the Customs Act, 1962 was pending adjudication. In those circumstances, the Court found no compelling basis to disturb the impugned judgment at that stage and declined interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>