<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2191 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466301</link>
    <description>Claim for recognition of foreign currency monetary item translation gains under accounting standards was held inconsistent with the income-tax provision governing foreign currency translation, and the claim was rejected. Proportionate disallowance of interest for alleged diversion of borrowed funds was deleted because available interest-free own funds sufficed when loans to a sister concern were advanced, so no disallowance sustained. Invocation of allocations under the rule for expenses relating to exempt income cannot apply where no exempt income exists, and therefore cannot be applied. Tax-sparing credit for dividends exempt in the source state was recognised as consistent with DTAA policy to promote economic development, and allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 11:42:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2191 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466301</link>
      <description>Claim for recognition of foreign currency monetary item translation gains under accounting standards was held inconsistent with the income-tax provision governing foreign currency translation, and the claim was rejected. Proportionate disallowance of interest for alleged diversion of borrowed funds was deleted because available interest-free own funds sufficed when loans to a sister concern were advanced, so no disallowance sustained. Invocation of allocations under the rule for expenses relating to exempt income cannot apply where no exempt income exists, and therefore cannot be applied. Tax-sparing credit for dividends exempt in the source state was recognised as consistent with DTAA policy to promote economic development, and allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>