<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1389 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466308</link>
    <description>Interpretation of an MFN clause: the tribunal applies present-tense construction to &quot;is a member,&quot; holding that a third state must be an OECD member at the time it enters into a DTAA with India for an earlier treaty beneficiary to claim parity; this conclusion follows precedent treating &quot;is&quot; as present. The claimant sought to import a more favourable dividend provision from a later India-Slovenia protocol into the India-Netherlands DTAA, but Slovenia&#039;s OECD membership postdated entry into force of its DTAA, so the MFN condition is unmet and treaty relief is refused. Result: the assessment addition is upheld and relief denied to the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 19:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1389 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466308</link>
      <description>Interpretation of an MFN clause: the tribunal applies present-tense construction to &quot;is a member,&quot; holding that a third state must be an OECD member at the time it enters into a DTAA with India for an earlier treaty beneficiary to claim parity; this conclusion follows precedent treating &quot;is&quot; as present. The claimant sought to import a more favourable dividend provision from a later India-Slovenia protocol into the India-Netherlands DTAA, but Slovenia&#039;s OECD membership postdated entry into force of its DTAA, so the MFN condition is unmet and treaty relief is refused. Result: the assessment addition is upheld and relief denied to the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>