<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1790 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466317</link>
    <description>Clubbing or consolidation of multiple tax periods/financial years into a single composite show-cause notice is impermissible; such notices lack jurisdiction and are invalid, and therefore the impugned composite show-cause notices and all consequential proceedings are quashed with liberty for revenue to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The reasoning rests on the principle that each tax period must be separately addressed and a solitary show-cause notice combining distinct assessment periods vitiates statutory procedure, rendering subsequent orders and notices non-establishing of liability. The quashing preserves the respondents&#039; right to reissue notices lawfully without endorsing the combined approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 19:07:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1790 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466317</link>
      <description>Clubbing or consolidation of multiple tax periods/financial years into a single composite show-cause notice is impermissible; such notices lack jurisdiction and are invalid, and therefore the impugned composite show-cause notices and all consequential proceedings are quashed with liberty for revenue to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The reasoning rests on the principle that each tax period must be separately addressed and a solitary show-cause notice combining distinct assessment periods vitiates statutory procedure, rendering subsequent orders and notices non-establishing of liability. The quashing preserves the respondents&#039; right to reissue notices lawfully without endorsing the combined approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>