<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 67 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal challenging the classification of &#039;Pan Chutney&#039; under the Central Excise Tariff. Previous decisions and legal precedents supported the classification under sub-heading no. 2107.91, upholding the demand for central excise duty. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the revision of the approved classification list were dismissed as the initial classification under sub-heading no. 2103.11 was never accepted by the Department. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a comprehensive analysis, finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions and affirming the classification and duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:24:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 67 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal challenging the classification of &#039;Pan Chutney&#039; under the Central Excise Tariff. Previous decisions and legal precedents supported the classification under sub-heading no. 2107.91, upholding the demand for central excise duty. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the revision of the approved classification list were dismissed as the initial classification under sub-heading no. 2103.11 was never accepted by the Department. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a comprehensive analysis, finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions and affirming the classification and duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>