<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 71 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49809</link>
    <description>Allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained on a bank statement alone; independent corroborative evidence of input procurement, production capacity, power consumption, removal and sale is required, so the demand based only on inflated stock figures furnished to a bank was set aside. Admitted shortage reflected in the RG 1 register, however, constituted a statutory stock discrepancy sufficient to sustain duty, and the Tribunal upheld a reduced penalty in view of the limited nature of the lapse. The result was partial relief to the assessee, with the bank-statement-based demand annulled and the stock-shortage-based demand maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 71 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49809</link>
      <description>Allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained on a bank statement alone; independent corroborative evidence of input procurement, production capacity, power consumption, removal and sale is required, so the demand based only on inflated stock figures furnished to a bank was set aside. Admitted shortage reflected in the RG 1 register, however, constituted a statutory stock discrepancy sufficient to sustain duty, and the Tribunal upheld a reduced penalty in view of the limited nature of the lapse. The result was partial relief to the assessee, with the bank-statement-based demand annulled and the stock-shortage-based demand maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>