<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1771 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466256</link>
    <description>Termination of probation was issued by the employer after considering specified materials; the decision rested on the employer&#039;s subjective satisfaction regarding confirmation. The court found that complaints and related proceedings were vitiated by mala fide and extraneous considerations, and noted absence of a departmental enquiry and reference to an Internal Complaints Committee enquiry. The court acknowledged the general non-interference principle where employer satisfaction is subjective, but also recorded that mala fide findings were established; notwithstanding those findings the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 19:28:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1771 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466256</link>
      <description>Termination of probation was issued by the employer after considering specified materials; the decision rested on the employer&#039;s subjective satisfaction regarding confirmation. The court found that complaints and related proceedings were vitiated by mala fide and extraneous considerations, and noted absence of a departmental enquiry and reference to an Internal Complaints Committee enquiry. The court acknowledged the general non-interference principle where employer satisfaction is subjective, but also recorded that mala fide findings were established; notwithstanding those findings the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>