https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49790 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It concluded that the appellants had included the cost of Butyl Rubber in the cost of production, disclosed all relevant facts to the department, and thus, there was no suppression with an intent to evade duty. The demand was also hit by limitation, and the classification of different classes of buyers was justified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law. en-us Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49790 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It concluded that the appellants had included the cost of Butyl Rubber in the cost of production, disclosed all relevant facts to the department, and thus, there was no suppression with an intent to evade duty. The demand was also hit by limitation, and the classification of different classes of buyers was justified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49790