<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 54 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49783</link>
    <description>Under the anti-dumping scheme, an appeal lies only against the Central Government&#039;s determination imposing duty, not against the Designated Authority&#039;s recommendatory findings. Because no notification imposing anti-dumping duty had been issued for the goods concerned, the Tribunal&#039;s appellate jurisdiction was not attracted. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:16:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 54 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49783</link>
      <description>Under the anti-dumping scheme, an appeal lies only against the Central Government&#039;s determination imposing duty, not against the Designated Authority&#039;s recommendatory findings. Because no notification imposing anti-dumping duty had been issued for the goods concerned, the Tribunal&#039;s appellate jurisdiction was not attracted. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>