<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1538 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785782</link>
    <description>Addition under the tax provision for difference between agreement value and stamp duty valuation is deleted because the disparity (4.87%) falls within the recognised tolerance proviso and the parity principle between stamp duty valuation and income valuation requires a single fair market value; the previous appellate confirmation was set aside. Addition based on gross savings bank interest deleted because net interest (after allowable interest expenditure) was offered to tax and AO ignored permissible netting. Addition for alleged omission of long-term capital gain deleted as shares were held over twelve months and capital gain exemption applies. Alleged undisclosed interest is restored to AO for limited factual verification to prevent double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 08:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1538 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785782</link>
      <description>Addition under the tax provision for difference between agreement value and stamp duty valuation is deleted because the disparity (4.87%) falls within the recognised tolerance proviso and the parity principle between stamp duty valuation and income valuation requires a single fair market value; the previous appellate confirmation was set aside. Addition based on gross savings bank interest deleted because net interest (after allowable interest expenditure) was offered to tax and AO ignored permissible netting. Addition for alleged omission of long-term capital gain deleted as shares were held over twelve months and capital gain exemption applies. Alleged undisclosed interest is restored to AO for limited factual verification to prevent double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>