<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1557 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785801</link>
    <description>Consolidation of multiple financial years for issuing a show cause notice and validity under the CGST statute was examined; the court held that a show cause notice issued without complying with statutory issuance principles is liable to be quashed, and permitted re-issuance strictly in accordance with the statutory provision. The court rejected application of a merger-of-judgments concept where the Supreme Court dismissed a petition in limine, and held that subsequent contrary High Court rulings within the State bind lower authorities; consequence: authorities must follow the later state High Court view unless legally impeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 08:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1557 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785801</link>
      <description>Consolidation of multiple financial years for issuing a show cause notice and validity under the CGST statute was examined; the court held that a show cause notice issued without complying with statutory issuance principles is liable to be quashed, and permitted re-issuance strictly in accordance with the statutory provision. The court rejected application of a merger-of-judgments concept where the Supreme Court dismissed a petition in limine, and held that subsequent contrary High Court rulings within the State bind lower authorities; consequence: authorities must follow the later state High Court view unless legally impeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>