<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cross-border payments for marketing and support services: tribunal limits unsubstantiated reimbursed expenses and remits provision accounting for verification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96478</link>
    <description>Cross-border payments to a US associated enterprise were examined for classification as fees for included services under the &quot;make available&quot; concept and for withholding-tax noncompliance leading to disallowance under withholding provisions. The tribunal found the nature and basis of claimed marketing, administrative and process outsourcing charges unexplained and disproportionately high (about 53% of revenue); some costs may qualify as fees for included services. Absent proper documentary bases, the tribunal directed treating separately claimed marketing expenses as allowable but limited to 20% if unsubstantiated, allowed hearing before final disallowance, and remitted accounting treatment of recurring refund provisions to the AO for verification and adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 08:55:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 08:55:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cross-border payments for marketing and support services: tribunal limits unsubstantiated reimbursed expenses and remits provision accounting for verification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96478</link>
      <description>Cross-border payments to a US associated enterprise were examined for classification as fees for included services under the &quot;make available&quot; concept and for withholding-tax noncompliance leading to disallowance under withholding provisions. The tribunal found the nature and basis of claimed marketing, administrative and process outsourcing charges unexplained and disproportionately high (about 53% of revenue); some costs may qualify as fees for included services. Absent proper documentary bases, the tribunal directed treating separately claimed marketing expenses as allowable but limited to 20% if unsubstantiated, allowed hearing before final disallowance, and remitted accounting treatment of recurring refund provisions to the AO for verification and adjustment.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 08:55:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>