<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reverse charge liability for service tax and extended limitation: demand against provider quashed, appeal allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96476</link>
    <description>Reverse charge mechanism for service tax distinguishes the recipients liability from the providers: where law makes the service recipient solely liable to pay, the provider is not answerable for unpaid tax. The Revenue bears the burden to prove fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts before invoking the extended period of limitation; absent such proof and where the provider had a bona fide belief that liability rested on the recipient, an extended-period demand against the provider cannot be sustained. Result: impugned extended-period demand set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 08:55:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 08:55:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reverse charge liability for service tax and extended limitation: demand against provider quashed, appeal allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96476</link>
      <description>Reverse charge mechanism for service tax distinguishes the recipients liability from the providers: where law makes the service recipient solely liable to pay, the provider is not answerable for unpaid tax. The Revenue bears the burden to prove fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts before invoking the extended period of limitation; absent such proof and where the provider had a bona fide belief that liability rested on the recipient, an extended-period demand against the provider cannot be sustained. Result: impugned extended-period demand set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 08:55:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>