<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 84 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49769</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal for stay of duty collection amounting to Rs. 6,39,272 for manufacturing ayurvedic medicaments, specifically &quot;mahabhringraj tel,&quot; emphasizing the curative properties of active ingredients. The Tribunal considered the product as ayurvedic medicine, rejecting the department&#039;s classification under chapter 3305.10 in favor of 3003.30. It stressed consistency in judicial decisions, referencing past cases and cautioning against conflicting judgments. The decision favored the appellants, highlighting the need for uniformity in interpreting similar cases and upholding their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 84 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49769</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal for stay of duty collection amounting to Rs. 6,39,272 for manufacturing ayurvedic medicaments, specifically &quot;mahabhringraj tel,&quot; emphasizing the curative properties of active ingredients. The Tribunal considered the product as ayurvedic medicine, rejecting the department&#039;s classification under chapter 3305.10 in favor of 3003.30. It stressed consistency in judicial decisions, referencing past cases and cautioning against conflicting judgments. The decision favored the appellants, highlighting the need for uniformity in interpreting similar cases and upholding their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>