<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1523 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466250</link>
    <description>Petitioner was directed to amend the petition to bring on record the Resolution Professional; the court noted prior extension, filing of a vakalatnama and accepted the petitioners undertaking to amend while refusing to dispense with reverification, so amendment plus reverification must be effected. The petitioner was ordered to serve all respondents with a copy of the interim application; the petitioner undertook to effect service by the specified date, and the court accepted that undertaking. Proceedings were adjourned for further listing because the interim application was not on file or with counsel, and the matter was listed for a later date. No substantive or fiscal determination was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 16:38:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1523 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466250</link>
      <description>Petitioner was directed to amend the petition to bring on record the Resolution Professional; the court noted prior extension, filing of a vakalatnama and accepted the petitioners undertaking to amend while refusing to dispense with reverification, so amendment plus reverification must be effected. The petitioner was ordered to serve all respondents with a copy of the interim application; the petitioner undertook to effect service by the specified date, and the court accepted that undertaking. Proceedings were adjourned for further listing because the interim application was not on file or with counsel, and the matter was listed for a later date. No substantive or fiscal determination was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>