https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466228 Concurrent revisional jurisdiction under the Criminal Procedure Code requires an aggrieved party to approach the Sessions Court first in the ordinary course, and no exceptional circumstance was shown to justify direct recourse to the High Court. On maintenance, the evidence of the husband's admitted earnings, failure to support the wife and minor son, and the wife's sufficient cause to live separately supported the finding of neglect and refusal to maintain. The maintenance awarded to the wife and child was treated as proportionate to the husband's income and not excessive, so the revision failed on maintainability and on merits. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:24:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466228 Concurrent revisional jurisdiction under the Criminal Procedure Code requires an aggrieved party to approach the Sessions Court first in the ordinary course, and no exceptional circumstance was shown to justify direct recourse to the High Court. On maintenance, the evidence of the husband's admitted earnings, failure to support the wife and minor son, and the wife's sufficient cause to live separately supported the finding of neglect and refusal to maintain. The maintenance awarded to the wife and child was treated as proportionate to the husband's income and not excessive, so the revision failed on maintainability and on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466228