<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Natural justice and right to cross-examination in adjudication: tribunal must determine if a request was made before vitiating proceedings</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96462</link>
    <description>Principles of natural justice and availability of cross-examination were central: where a request for cross-examination is not established, omission to allow it cannot ipso facto vitiate adjudication under Section 138B of the Act; conversely, if a request was made and denied, procedural non-compliance would invalidate proceedings. The Tribunal failed to determine whether a request for cross-examination was ever made; consequently the appellate order was quashed and the matter remitted to the Tribunal to examine adjudicating records and decide the question of request and ensuing compliance with Section 138B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:52:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:52:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Natural justice and right to cross-examination in adjudication: tribunal must determine if a request was made before vitiating proceedings</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96462</link>
      <description>Principles of natural justice and availability of cross-examination were central: where a request for cross-examination is not established, omission to allow it cannot ipso facto vitiate adjudication under Section 138B of the Act; conversely, if a request was made and denied, procedural non-compliance would invalidate proceedings. The Tribunal failed to determine whether a request for cross-examination was ever made; consequently the appellate order was quashed and the matter remitted to the Tribunal to examine adjudicating records and decide the question of request and ensuing compliance with Section 138B.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:52:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>