<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 79 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49752</link>
    <description>Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applies only to a person who deals with excisable goods in the manner contemplated by the provision; it cannot be extended to impose a personal penalty on a manufacturer&#039;s employee for acts done within the course of employment absent an independent legal basis. As the employee had no separate role outside his official capacity, the personal penalty was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:50:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 79 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49752</link>
      <description>Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applies only to a person who deals with excisable goods in the manner contemplated by the provision; it cannot be extended to impose a personal penalty on a manufacturer&#039;s employee for acts done within the course of employment absent an independent legal basis. As the employee had no separate role outside his official capacity, the personal penalty was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>