<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1497 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785741</link>
    <description>Investigation under anti-profiteering concerning passthrough of input tax credit found that the supplier had discharged the statutory obligation to pass on ITC; DGAP verification showed total benefits passed exceeded initially determined profiteering amount, including specific remittance to an eligible buyer, and the DGAP report was accepted, concluding proceedings and requiring no further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1497 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785741</link>
      <description>Investigation under anti-profiteering concerning passthrough of input tax credit found that the supplier had discharged the statutory obligation to pass on ITC; DGAP verification showed total benefits passed exceeded initially determined profiteering amount, including specific remittance to an eligible buyer, and the DGAP report was accepted, concluding proceedings and requiring no further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>