https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785744 Sub-section (8) requires an additional deposit of 20% of disputed tax over the amount under sub-section (6) of Section 107; sub-section (6) requires 10% deposit to invoke appellate remedy, and no such deposit was made in the earlier appeal. The interim direction is modified to require a deposit of Rs.2,00,000 before the Adjudicating Authority, and the seized vehicle is to be released within one week of that deposit while remaining conditions continue to operate until writ disposal. A contempt application for breach of the prior release direction is rejected because the complainant did not execute the required indemnity bond. en-us Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:22:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785744 Sub-section (8) requires an additional deposit of 20% of disputed tax over the amount under sub-section (6) of Section 107; sub-section (6) requires 10% deposit to invoke appellate remedy, and no such deposit was made in the earlier appeal. The interim direction is modified to require a deposit of Rs.2,00,000 before the Adjudicating Authority, and the seized vehicle is to be released within one week of that deposit while remaining conditions continue to operate until writ disposal. A contempt application for breach of the prior release direction is rejected because the complainant did not execute the required indemnity bond. Case-Laws GST Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785744