<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1582 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466210</link>
    <description>Dispute concerns whether business support services qualify as input services and whether Cenvat credit can be availed for services received outside the factory. The tribunal reasoned that the definition of input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules covers services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to manufacture and clearance, and therefore business support services incurred as business expenses before the 2011 amendment were eligible for credit; outcome: credit allowed for April 2007March 2011. For the post-2011 period the service was not specifically excluded, so invoice evidence was held sufficient for credit; outcome: invoices accepted and credits allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 19:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=882208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1582 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466210</link>
      <description>Dispute concerns whether business support services qualify as input services and whether Cenvat credit can be availed for services received outside the factory. The tribunal reasoned that the definition of input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules covers services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to manufacture and clearance, and therefore business support services incurred as business expenses before the 2011 amendment were eligible for credit; outcome: credit allowed for April 2007March 2011. For the post-2011 period the service was not specifically excluded, so invoice evidence was held sufficient for credit; outcome: invoices accepted and credits allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>