<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1438 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785682</link>
    <description>Valuation of scrap transferred to a sister unit was addressed, with the CAS-4 costing standard held inapplicable because CAS-4 pertains to manufactured goods and its cost headings cannot sensibly be applied to scrap; consequence: CAS-4 cannot determine valuation for scrap. The tribunal recognised that when the receiving related unit avails CENVAT credit, the transaction is revenue neutral and no financial gain arises from claimed undervaluation; consequence: demand unsustainable on revenue-neutrality grounds. The decision also considered extended limitation principles cited in a prior final order as applicable, affecting the viability of recovery though without altering the revenue-neutral finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:51:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1438 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785682</link>
      <description>Valuation of scrap transferred to a sister unit was addressed, with the CAS-4 costing standard held inapplicable because CAS-4 pertains to manufactured goods and its cost headings cannot sensibly be applied to scrap; consequence: CAS-4 cannot determine valuation for scrap. The tribunal recognised that when the receiving related unit avails CENVAT credit, the transaction is revenue neutral and no financial gain arises from claimed undervaluation; consequence: demand unsustainable on revenue-neutrality grounds. The decision also considered extended limitation principles cited in a prior final order as applicable, affecting the viability of recovery though without altering the revenue-neutral finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>