<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1664 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466206</link>
    <description>Classification of imported material as ore or concentrate was determined by applying HSN explanatory notes to tariff classification, with no fixed percentage concentration prescribed in the tariff; consequence: the material could not be treated as concentrate solely for lacking a numeric threshold. The absence of drawn samples and laboratory testing was held not fatal to proceedings, with evidentiary gaps insufficient to negate classification based on available description; consequence: denial of exemption on the basis of characterisation as concentrate was erroneous. Operative effect: the impugned finding denying exemption was set aside and the contested relief granted to the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:51:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1664 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466206</link>
      <description>Classification of imported material as ore or concentrate was determined by applying HSN explanatory notes to tariff classification, with no fixed percentage concentration prescribed in the tariff; consequence: the material could not be treated as concentrate solely for lacking a numeric threshold. The absence of drawn samples and laboratory testing was held not fatal to proceedings, with evidentiary gaps insufficient to negate classification based on available description; consequence: denial of exemption on the basis of characterisation as concentrate was erroneous. Operative effect: the impugned finding denying exemption was set aside and the contested relief granted to the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>