<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (10) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49716</link>
    <description>Control of a company under the Excess Profits Tax Act depends on ownership of the majority of vote-carrying shares. Directors may have a controlling interest where they are the registered holders of those shares, even if the beneficial interest lies elsewhere. But a director who merely votes shares as another shareholder&#039;s agent under a revocable authority does not acquire those shares or the controlling interest, because the shares remain vested in and subject to the shareholder&#039;s will. On that reasoning, the directors were held not to have a controlling interest in the respondent company, and the question was answered in the negative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (10) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49716</link>
      <description>Control of a company under the Excess Profits Tax Act depends on ownership of the majority of vote-carrying shares. Directors may have a controlling interest where they are the registered holders of those shares, even if the beneficial interest lies elsewhere. But a director who merely votes shares as another shareholder&#039;s agent under a revocable authority does not acquire those shares or the controlling interest, because the shares remain vested in and subject to the shareholder&#039;s will. On that reasoning, the directors were held not to have a controlling interest in the respondent company, and the question was answered in the negative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>