<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1401 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785645</link>
    <description>Increase in coal handling charges concerned definition of the relevant product and geographic market and whether the terminal was dominant and abused dominance by imposing mandatory coordination and liaisoning charges through three related entities; the tribunal treated the terminal as the sole-player dominant undertaking and accepted DG/CCI findings that the charges were mandatory and collected via entities controlled by the same group, constituting abusive conduct causing appreciable adverse effect on competition, set aside the impugned CCI order, allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to the authority for fresh adjudication after hearing parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1401 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785645</link>
      <description>Increase in coal handling charges concerned definition of the relevant product and geographic market and whether the terminal was dominant and abused dominance by imposing mandatory coordination and liaisoning charges through three related entities; the tribunal treated the terminal as the sole-player dominant undertaking and accepted DG/CCI findings that the charges were mandatory and collected via entities controlled by the same group, constituting abusive conduct causing appreciable adverse effect on competition, set aside the impugned CCI order, allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to the authority for fresh adjudication after hearing parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>