<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1421 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785665</link>
    <description>The article concerns the taxability of payments for computer software under section 9 of the Income Tax Act, including whether a non-resident had a business connection or permanent establishment in India and whether consideration for software licences constituted royalty. It notes the Delhi High Court view that resident end-users or distributors&#039; payments to non-resident software suppliers for resale or use of software under EULAs and distribution agreements do not amount to royalty for use of copyright and do not create taxable income in India. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with that judgment, and the special leave petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1421 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785665</link>
      <description>The article concerns the taxability of payments for computer software under section 9 of the Income Tax Act, including whether a non-resident had a business connection or permanent establishment in India and whether consideration for software licences constituted royalty. It notes the Delhi High Court view that resident end-users or distributors&#039; payments to non-resident software suppliers for resale or use of software under EULAs and distribution agreements do not amount to royalty for use of copyright and do not create taxable income in India. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with that judgment, and the special leave petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>