<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1424 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785668</link>
    <description>Reassessment could not be initiated where the assessment was sought to be reopened on the same material after specific queries had already been raised and answered, because mere change of opinion does not satisfy the jurisdictional requirements for reopening. The High Court found that no substantial question of law arose on these facts, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere, dismissing the special leave petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1424 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785668</link>
      <description>Reassessment could not be initiated where the assessment was sought to be reopened on the same material after specific queries had already been raised and answered, because mere change of opinion does not satisfy the jurisdictional requirements for reopening. The High Court found that no substantial question of law arose on these facts, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere, dismissing the special leave petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>