<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1434 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785678</link>
    <description>Duplication of proceedings arose where two separate authorities imposed penalties and interest for delayed GSTR-3B filings for the same period; the HC concluded that such duplication results in double taxation and renders the later impugned action unsustainable in law, leading to quashing of the impugned order dated 06.01.2023 and relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:51:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1434 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785678</link>
      <description>Duplication of proceedings arose where two separate authorities imposed penalties and interest for delayed GSTR-3B filings for the same period; the HC concluded that such duplication results in double taxation and renders the later impugned action unsustainable in law, leading to quashing of the impugned order dated 06.01.2023 and relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>