<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1348 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785592</link>
    <description>Admissibility of Cenvat credit on rent-a-cab services was assessed against statutory exclusions and administrative circulars, with reliance on the Apex Court&#039;s Solar Industries precedent to treat employee too-and-fro transportation as non-input service; consequence: cenvat credit was not available on the facts and wrongful availment attracted penalty. Lower authority findings that the assessee suppressed facts in ST-3 returns and that duty would have remained undetected but for audit support recovery; consequence: extended period and regular limitation issues were engaged. Matter remitted to Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh examination of limitation both factually and legally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1348 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785592</link>
      <description>Admissibility of Cenvat credit on rent-a-cab services was assessed against statutory exclusions and administrative circulars, with reliance on the Apex Court&#039;s Solar Industries precedent to treat employee too-and-fro transportation as non-input service; consequence: cenvat credit was not available on the facts and wrongful availment attracted penalty. Lower authority findings that the assessee suppressed facts in ST-3 returns and that duty would have remained undetected but for audit support recovery; consequence: extended period and regular limitation issues were engaged. Matter remitted to Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh examination of limitation both factually and legally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>