<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1376 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785620</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing benchmarking requires comparables to be tested for functional similarity and, where available, reliable segmental data; one comparable was remanded for segment review, another for examination on its ARMS segment, a third was rejected in line with the earlier year, and a newly disputed comparable was sent back for full-profile scrutiny. Risk adjustment was not finally quantified and was remanded for fresh determination on proof of risk differences, while working capital adjustment was to be allowed under the DRP&#039;s methodology. Bank charges and provision for doubtful debts were treated as operating expenses for margin computation, requiring recomputation. A Rule 27 application based on an adjustment not arising from the assessment order was held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:26:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1376 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785620</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing benchmarking requires comparables to be tested for functional similarity and, where available, reliable segmental data; one comparable was remanded for segment review, another for examination on its ARMS segment, a third was rejected in line with the earlier year, and a newly disputed comparable was sent back for full-profile scrutiny. Risk adjustment was not finally quantified and was remanded for fresh determination on proof of risk differences, while working capital adjustment was to be allowed under the DRP&#039;s methodology. Bank charges and provision for doubtful debts were treated as operating expenses for margin computation, requiring recomputation. A Rule 27 application based on an adjustment not arising from the assessment order was held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>