<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST registration suspension and service of show cause notice via agent email: relief denied where petitioner blamed representative.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96411</link>
    <description>The text addresses GST registration suspension and service of a show cause notice sent to the chartered accountants email, holding that the registrant bore knowledge and responsibility for the contact details provided. Reliance on the professionals alleged failure to communicate was deemed insufficient without satisfactory proof or action against the representative, and an offer to deposit half the liability did not justify departing from statutory procedure. Consequently, discretionary equitable relief was refused and the petitions lacked merit and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:26:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST registration suspension and service of show cause notice via agent email: relief denied where petitioner blamed representative.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96411</link>
      <description>The text addresses GST registration suspension and service of a show cause notice sent to the chartered accountants email, holding that the registrant bore knowledge and responsibility for the contact details provided. Reliance on the professionals alleged failure to communicate was deemed insufficient without satisfactory proof or action against the representative, and an offer to deposit half the liability did not justify departing from statutory procedure. Consequently, discretionary equitable relief was refused and the petitions lacked merit and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:26:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>