<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Capital gains valuation under section 50C: circle rate factor follows revenue land classification, not actual commercial use.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96396</link>
    <description>Capital gains computation under section 50C: the property is recorded as agricultural/residential in revenue records, so circle rate characterisation must follow those records and the multiplicative factor of 1 applies even though the building was used commercially without sanction; deemed conversion cannot be presumed from unauthorized use until recognised by revenue authorities, so the assessing officer&#039;s application of factor 3 was contrary to revenue records and invalid, and the appellate authority&#039;s direction to apply factor 1 was affirmed by ITAT, resulting in the decision against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:26:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Capital gains valuation under section 50C: circle rate factor follows revenue land classification, not actual commercial use.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96396</link>
      <description>Capital gains computation under section 50C: the property is recorded as agricultural/residential in revenue records, so circle rate characterisation must follow those records and the multiplicative factor of 1 applies even though the building was used commercially without sanction; deemed conversion cannot be presumed from unauthorized use until recognised by revenue authorities, so the assessing officer&#039;s application of factor 3 was contrary to revenue records and invalid, and the appellate authority&#039;s direction to apply factor 1 was affirmed by ITAT, resulting in the decision against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:26:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>