<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49683</link>
    <description>Dividend received by a shareholder from tea companies was not agricultural income merely because the companies&#039; profits included agricultural income in their hands. Agricultural income under the Income-tax Act must be rent or revenue derived directly from land used for agricultural purposes, and dividend arises from the shareholder&#039;s investment in shares and the contractual rights of membership, not from any direct interest in the company&#039;s land or property. As a company is a separate juristic person from its shareholders, the agricultural character of the company&#039;s income does not attach to the dividend. The dividend was therefore taxable in the shareholder&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49683</link>
      <description>Dividend received by a shareholder from tea companies was not agricultural income merely because the companies&#039; profits included agricultural income in their hands. Agricultural income under the Income-tax Act must be rent or revenue derived directly from land used for agricultural purposes, and dividend arises from the shareholder&#039;s investment in shares and the contractual rights of membership, not from any direct interest in the company&#039;s land or property. As a company is a separate juristic person from its shareholders, the agricultural character of the company&#039;s income does not attach to the dividend. The dividend was therefore taxable in the shareholder&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>