<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1861 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466140</link>
    <description>Judicial review lies over a Speaker&#039;s disqualification order under the Tenth Schedule, and the constitutional finality attached to such orders does not bar review. A resignation can be examined only for voluntariness and genuineness under Article 190(3)(b); the Speaker cannot probe political motive, and a later resignation does not undo an already accrued disqualification or render pending proceedings infructuous. The Speaker also cannot impose an additional punitive consequence by barring members from contesting or holding office until the end of the legislative term, as that is not authorised by the Constitution. No reference to a larger Bench was required because existing Constitution Bench authority governed the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 11:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1861 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466140</link>
      <description>Judicial review lies over a Speaker&#039;s disqualification order under the Tenth Schedule, and the constitutional finality attached to such orders does not bar review. A resignation can be examined only for voluntariness and genuineness under Article 190(3)(b); the Speaker cannot probe political motive, and a later resignation does not undo an already accrued disqualification or render pending proceedings infructuous. The Speaker also cannot impose an additional punitive consequence by barring members from contesting or holding office until the end of the legislative term, as that is not authorised by the Constitution. No reference to a larger Bench was required because existing Constitution Bench authority governed the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>