<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1753 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466142</link>
    <description>Adjudicating Authority review of an approved resolution plan is confined to the requirements under Sections 30(2) and 31 of the IBC and does not extend to unilateral alteration of commercially approved terms. Restricting use of funds held in the corporate debtor&#039;s current account for creditor payments was treated as an impermissible interference with the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial allocation where the plan had already been found compliant and no statutory deficiency required correction. The appropriate response to non-compliance is remittal to the Committee of Creditors, rather than modification by the Adjudicating Authority. The restrictive condition was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh orders within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 19:03:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1753 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466142</link>
      <description>Adjudicating Authority review of an approved resolution plan is confined to the requirements under Sections 30(2) and 31 of the IBC and does not extend to unilateral alteration of commercially approved terms. Restricting use of funds held in the corporate debtor&#039;s current account for creditor payments was treated as an impermissible interference with the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial allocation where the plan had already been found compliant and no statutory deficiency required correction. The appropriate response to non-compliance is remittal to the Committee of Creditors, rather than modification by the Adjudicating Authority. The restrictive condition was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh orders within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>