<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 934 - HYDERABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466139</link>
    <description>Challenge to a state enactment modifying land acquisition valuation was considered; the court reaffirmed prior precedent that agrarian-reform protections apply where lands are under personal cultivation and within ceiling limits, requiring compensation at market value measured as of the date of publication of the acquisition notification, and rejected arguments that an interim stay nullified that precedent. Consequently, statutory deviations reducing compensation were disallowed, appeals were dismissed, previously paid sums to be adjusted against market-value awards, and relief granted to claimants who met the proviso&#039;s conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:54:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 934 - HYDERABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466139</link>
      <description>Challenge to a state enactment modifying land acquisition valuation was considered; the court reaffirmed prior precedent that agrarian-reform protections apply where lands are under personal cultivation and within ceiling limits, requiring compensation at market value measured as of the date of publication of the acquisition notification, and rejected arguments that an interim stay nullified that precedent. Consequently, statutory deviations reducing compensation were disallowed, appeals were dismissed, previously paid sums to be adjusted against market-value awards, and relief granted to claimants who met the proviso&#039;s conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>