<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (12) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49665</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 5(7A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, ruling that it does not violate fundamental rights under Article 14 and Article 19(1)(g). The court found the transfer orders to be valid, emphasizing administrative convenience and the presumption of honesty in officials. All petitions challenging the transfer orders were dismissed, with the court emphasizing the importance of a considerate administration of the Income-tax Act to balance the rights of assessees and public interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (12) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49665</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 5(7A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, ruling that it does not violate fundamental rights under Article 14 and Article 19(1)(g). The court found the transfer orders to be valid, emphasizing administrative convenience and the presumption of honesty in officials. All petitions challenging the transfer orders were dismissed, with the court emphasizing the importance of a considerate administration of the Income-tax Act to balance the rights of assessees and public interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>