<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1295 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785539</link>
    <description>Admissibility and reliance on witness statements and electronic records in customs valuation disputes are constrained by statutory evidentiary safeguards; an authority must examine a maker of a statement, form an opinion on admissibility, and allow cross-examination before that statement may be used to alter declared transaction value, otherwise it is inadmissible. Electronic records and computer printouts require prescribed certification and procedural compliance before they can be relied upon; absence of certificate, lack of panchnama, and retraction of statements undermine their evidentiary value. Noncompliance with these evidentiary requirements precludes sustaining re-determination of transaction value and related penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1295 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785539</link>
      <description>Admissibility and reliance on witness statements and electronic records in customs valuation disputes are constrained by statutory evidentiary safeguards; an authority must examine a maker of a statement, form an opinion on admissibility, and allow cross-examination before that statement may be used to alter declared transaction value, otherwise it is inadmissible. Electronic records and computer printouts require prescribed certification and procedural compliance before they can be relied upon; absence of certificate, lack of panchnama, and retraction of statements undermine their evidentiary value. Noncompliance with these evidentiary requirements precludes sustaining re-determination of transaction value and related penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>