<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1296 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785540</link>
    <description>Rejection of declared transaction value is sustained where part of the consideration is paid outside banking channels, vitiating the invoice as transaction value; consequence: adoption of residual method by adding undeclared consideration to assessable value. Re-determination based on voluntary admissions recorded under section 108 and corroborative enforcement material supports valuation uplift; consequence: confirmation of differential customs duty. Deliberate non-disclosure of actual consideration constitutes suppression and wilful misstatement, justifying invocation of the extended period of limitation; consequence: extended assessment timeframe. Inclusion of interest on differential duty is mandatory. Admissions and corroborative findings justify imposition of mandatory penalty and confiscation for mis-declaration; consequence: upheld penalty and confiscation findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1296 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785540</link>
      <description>Rejection of declared transaction value is sustained where part of the consideration is paid outside banking channels, vitiating the invoice as transaction value; consequence: adoption of residual method by adding undeclared consideration to assessable value. Re-determination based on voluntary admissions recorded under section 108 and corroborative enforcement material supports valuation uplift; consequence: confirmation of differential customs duty. Deliberate non-disclosure of actual consideration constitutes suppression and wilful misstatement, justifying invocation of the extended period of limitation; consequence: extended assessment timeframe. Inclusion of interest on differential duty is mandatory. Admissions and corroborative findings justify imposition of mandatory penalty and confiscation for mis-declaration; consequence: upheld penalty and confiscation findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>