<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1298 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785542</link>
    <description>Suspension of a customs broker licence was assessed under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 and found to satisfy the two prerequisites for immediate suspension, namely contemplation of an inquiry and suspension occurring before or during such inquiry, so the initial suspension order is valid. Continuation of the suspension after providing a hearing complied with the procedural requirement for post-suspension hearing and was therefore sustained. Administrative instructions requiring recorded reasons for immediate suspension were followed. Findings about the brokers failure of due diligence, mis-declaration and supervisory/vicarious liability for employee acts were accepted, resulting in rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1298 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785542</link>
      <description>Suspension of a customs broker licence was assessed under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 and found to satisfy the two prerequisites for immediate suspension, namely contemplation of an inquiry and suspension occurring before or during such inquiry, so the initial suspension order is valid. Continuation of the suspension after providing a hearing complied with the procedural requirement for post-suspension hearing and was therefore sustained. Administrative instructions requiring recorded reasons for immediate suspension were followed. Findings about the brokers failure of due diligence, mis-declaration and supervisory/vicarious liability for employee acts were accepted, resulting in rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>