<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (5) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49659</link>
    <description>Receipts from forest leases and forest produce of spontaneous growth are not agricultural income where the assessee does not carry out basic agricultural operations on the soil itself. Income from the Bankura forest lease, taken on short terms for lump sums with rights to cut trees and jungle growth, was held not to be agricultural income and was not shown to be capital receipts displacing taxability. Income from the Kharagpur forest, derived from wild bamboo, sabai grass and timber, also failed to qualify as agricultural income because rotational felling, conservation and clearing around trees were only subsequent forestry operations. The governing principle is that forest growth of spontaneous origin does not become agricultural income merely because of conservation measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 07:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (5) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49659</link>
      <description>Receipts from forest leases and forest produce of spontaneous growth are not agricultural income where the assessee does not carry out basic agricultural operations on the soil itself. Income from the Bankura forest lease, taken on short terms for lump sums with rights to cut trees and jungle growth, was held not to be agricultural income and was not shown to be capital receipts displacing taxability. Income from the Kharagpur forest, derived from wild bamboo, sabai grass and timber, also failed to qualify as agricultural income because rotational felling, conservation and clearing around trees were only subsequent forestry operations. The governing principle is that forest growth of spontaneous origin does not become agricultural income merely because of conservation measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>