<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1317 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785561</link>
    <description>Addition for unexplained bank deposits was deleted because the amount had already been offered in the return of income, precluding double taxation and negating the addition. Addition for alleged unaccounted investment in construction of flats was deleted because the valuer produced market value rather than cost of construction; the valuation officer failed to apply per square foot construction costing or bifurcate material and labour as per accepted construction costing guidelines, and no contemporaneous investment in the year was established, so market value could not be treated as construction cost, resulting in deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1317 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785561</link>
      <description>Addition for unexplained bank deposits was deleted because the amount had already been offered in the return of income, precluding double taxation and negating the addition. Addition for alleged unaccounted investment in construction of flats was deleted because the valuer produced market value rather than cost of construction; the valuation officer failed to apply per square foot construction costing or bifurcate material and labour as per accepted construction costing guidelines, and no contemporaneous investment in the year was established, so market value could not be treated as construction cost, resulting in deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>