https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96375 Omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules raised whether proceedings pending under the deleted provision could continue. The court applied the saving clause doctrine, reasoning that continuance of proceedings after omission is permissible only if a saving clause exists; in the absence of any saving clause the pending proceedings lapse. This conclusion is stated subject to the General Clauses Act and specifically Section 6 of that Act. Writ petitions were allowed, resulting in setting aside of the impugned assessment orders. en-us Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:06 +0530 Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96375 Omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules raised whether proceedings pending under the deleted provision could continue. The court applied the saving clause doctrine, reasoning that continuance of proceedings after omission is permissible only if a saving clause exists; in the absence of any saving clause the pending proceedings lapse. This conclusion is stated subject to the General Clauses Act and specifically Section 6 of that Act. Writ petitions were allowed, resulting in setting aside of the impugned assessment orders. Highlights GST Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:06 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96375